Posts Tagged ‘cultural befuddlement’

You Go, Michael Vick

President Obama re-ignited the flames of a “controversy” that seemingly is bound to smolder forever. I like animals, especially dogs. I’m neither a fan of the President, nor the NFL. But I’m with Obama on this one.

Every time Michael Vick takes another step that does not evidence failure on his road to redemption, the self-sanctimonious crowd spins into action, wasting no time, sparing no vitriol, to kick him and kick him again. This is expected from single-issue liberals, especially the limousine type, but the battle has been joined from the right, which proves just how utterly confused this story has become.

Let’s start with Tucker Carlson.

“I’m a Christian, I’ve made mistakes myself, I believe fervently in second chances, but Michael Vick killed dogs, and he did [it] in a heartless and cruel way,” Carlson said. “And I think personally he should have been executed for that.

Source: NYDailyNews.com

Did he really claim belief in second chances, a “fervent” belief based on his Christian faith, and in the same sentence suggest Vick should have been executed? It’s safe to dismiss this as provocative simply for publicity’s sake. I mostly enjoy Carlson, but he willingly sacrificed credibility for media whoredom. Lost in the blitz (pun intended?) is another human, God’s creature, objectified in the cause of self-aggrandizement.  Shame on Tucker Carlson.

Let’s not forget the lefties who can’t resist similar temptations. They are also in it for the fund raising. But are the donations gathered for the “cause” or to maintain their livelihood? What would they do if they weren’t living on the dole? These self-interested “advocates” also view Michael Vick only as an object to be used for their own advancement, not a living, flawed, human being just as they are. Shame on them too.

Allow me to answer the complaints.

1. Animal Cruelty is an unforgivable sin

Hogwash. Cop killers become causes célèbres (e.g. Mumia Abu-Jamal, FALN). Terrorists’ public images are rehabilitated (e.g William Ayers, Gerry Adams, Yasser Arafat). Baby killers are virtually worshipped. Sex offenders, obligated to register and continue paying for their crimes after serving their time, have defenders of their civil rights. But abuse an animal and there is no redemption. This is insane. I reject the elevation of animal life above human life.

2. We should all be sick of pampered celebrities

I’ve written before about not being enamored of celebrities. They are often self-important buffoons who receive inexplicable special treatment. That, however, is not a capital offense. They also are sometimes targeted for high profile prosecutions to “send a message” to the masses. This is a favored tactic of the IRS, some argue their most effective enforcement mechanism. So celebrity can cut both ways.

It’s safe to say no one would be engaged in this “issue” were Michael Vick not a public person. My bottom line is this: he did his time. What he did was despicable and should always be condemned. But we have more to gain corporately from a rehabilitated sinner. Those screeching the loudest expose pure self interest, masquerading as concern. Like Tucker Carlson, my faith informs my belief in redemption. Unlike him, and all the others, my beliefs must be more honest. I’m not willing to sacrifice them, or a second chance recipient, for an exercise in self-absorbed self-sanctimony.

In the article referenced above, I wrote:

I’m always wary of presuming to “know” public people, and of consequently ascribing unwarranted character, or lack thereof. The parts of their lives which aren’t necessarily guarded are too often carefully choreographed.

I am skeptical of reading too much into celebrity mea culpas. They are usually quite transparent but, even when seemingly genuine, reading another’s heart is impossible. Reading a practiced performer’s heart is even more so. While acknowledging the difficulties, Michael Vick struck me as possessing real remorse. Nothing he has done since causes me to question that guess. Quite the contrary, everything has confirmed it. I’m not willing to judge him by a standard I too would fail. I’m pulling for him and celebrate his success without reservation.

Post to Twitter

USA Network’s Characters Welcome

USA is one of my favorite networks.  With TNT and A&E, they keep TV tolerable given the dearth of worthwhile programming on the big networks. Besides their own original programs, the time blocks devoted to reruns of a single show, and broadcasting new episodes twice the day they first air also work for me.

But I scratch my head every time the Characters Welcome commercial is aired.

It is unfathomable to me how dividing us by focusing solely on our differences brings us together. That is a pernicious lie.  To be clear, I do believe our differences can and should be acknowledged, celebrated, and leveraged to make us all more complete.  The whole is greater than the parts when it is assembled and functioning in concert.  Dismantling the whole into its component parts discards that value. Sadly, some would rather control separate objects.

It may be a fine line, but not a distinction without a difference.  “Multiculturalism” as they preach it really isn’t, or at least not as advertised. It draws attention to what separates us and ignores what brings us together. It might more appropriately be called “motley-culturalism.”

If the goal is to dignify the worth of everyone individually and not to antagonize by pinpointing our differences, the focus should be fixed instead on what we share in common. The same God breathed life into each of us — Jew, Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, atheist, black, white, male, female, young, old, short, tall … all of us.

Post to Twitter